- Main
- Society, Politics & Philosophy
- Does State Spying Make Us Safer?: The...
Does State Spying Make Us Safer?: The Munk Debate On Mass Surveillance
Michael Hayden, Alan Dershowitz, Glenn Greenwald, Alexis Ohanian你有多喜欢这本书?
下载文件的质量如何?
下载该书,以评价其质量
下载文件的质量如何?
Does government surveillance make us safer?
The thirteenth Munk Debate, held in Toronto on Friday, May 2, 2014, pitted Michael Hayden and Alan Dershowitz against Glenn Greenwald and Alexis Ohanian to debate whether state surveillance is a legitimate defense of our freedom. In a risk-filled world, democracies are increasingly turning to large-scale state surveillance, at home and abroad, to fight complex and unconventional threats — but is it justified?
For some, the threats justify the current surveillance system, and the laws and institutions of democracies are capable of balancing the needs of individual privacy with collective security. But for others, we're in peril of sacrificing to a vast and unaccountable state surveillance apparatus the civil liberties that guarantee citizens’ basic freedoms and our democratic way of life.
In this edition of the Munk Debates, former head of the CIA and NSA Michael Hayden and civil liberties lawyer Alan Dershowitz square off against journalist Glenn Greenwald and reddit co-founder Alexis Ohanian to debate the legitimacy of state surveillance. With issues of Internet privacy gaining prominence, the Munk Debate on the Surveillance State asks: Should government be able to monitor our activities to keep us safe?
The thirteenth Munk Debate, held in Toronto on Friday, May 2, 2014, pitted Michael Hayden and Alan Dershowitz against Glenn Greenwald and Alexis Ohanian to debate whether state surveillance is a legitimate defense of our freedom. In a risk-filled world, democracies are increasingly turning to large-scale state surveillance, at home and abroad, to fight complex and unconventional threats — but is it justified?
For some, the threats justify the current surveillance system, and the laws and institutions of democracies are capable of balancing the needs of individual privacy with collective security. But for others, we're in peril of sacrificing to a vast and unaccountable state surveillance apparatus the civil liberties that guarantee citizens’ basic freedoms and our democratic way of life.
In this edition of the Munk Debates, former head of the CIA and NSA Michael Hayden and civil liberties lawyer Alan Dershowitz square off against journalist Glenn Greenwald and reddit co-founder Alexis Ohanian to debate the legitimacy of state surveillance. With issues of Internet privacy gaining prominence, the Munk Debate on the Surveillance State asks: Should government be able to monitor our activities to keep us safe?
年:
2014
出版社:
House of Anansi Press Inc.
语言:
english
页:
128
ISBN 10:
1770898425
ISBN 13:
9781770898424
文件:
EPUB, 1.74 MB
您的标签:
IPFS:
CID , CID Blake2b
english, 2014
在1-5分钟内,文件将被发送到您的电子邮件。
该文件将通过电报信使发送给您。 您最多可能需要 1-5 分钟才能收到它。
注意:确保您已将您的帐户链接到 Z-Library Telegram 机器人。
该文件将发送到您的 Kindle 帐户。 您最多可能需要 1-5 分钟才能收到它。
请注意:您需要验证要发送到Kindle的每本书。检查您的邮箱中是否有来自亚马逊Kindle的验证电子邮件。
正在转换
转换为 失败